The web development scenario is changing rapidly and almost every month the new JS framework is being introduced. Let’s understand the benefits of each framework and difference between them so that we can use the apt framework according to the requirements.
A- Angular 2.0
AngularJS framework is considered currently as the most popular among three and for all good reasons. It was the first released and represented a large improvement over the previous generation of client-side MVC frameworks. AngularJS took a pragmatic approach that resonated with its adopters. Angular 2.0 framework is free from unnecessary complexity. From the perspective of performance, native app support and server-side rendering the Angular 2.0 has gain brownie points. Let’s have a quick look on merits of Angular 2.0.
- 1. Performance of Angular 2.0 is three to five times faster as compared to the previous version.
- 2. Offers server-side rendering which speeds up initial page load time and therefore improves SEO by making dynamic pages easy to crawl. Fast page rendering greatly improvises the feel of next generation of web applications written in the AngularJS framework.
- 3. Easy-to-test code.
- 4. It is the most popular framework.
- 5. Easy creation of personalized Document Object Model (DOM) elements.
- 6. Clean and precise UI design and alteration.
- 7. Dependency injection.
- 8. Simple routing.
- 9. The Angular framework facilitates extension of HTML syntax and easily creates reusable components by directives.
- 10. Data modeling is limited for the use of small data models which makes the code simple and easy to test.
A2: Demerits Attached
- 1. Complicated directive API.
- 2. AngularJS goes slow with pages with many interactive pages.
- 3. There lies performance issue because of DOM elements.
- 4. Hard to debug scopes but they are very easy to use.
- 5. The router is limited.
A3: Who Should Use AngularJS?
B- Ember 2.0
- 1. Ember JS holds strong data layer which integrates well with Java.
- 2. Ember’s object model facilitates key-value observation.
- 3. Ember minimizes DOM.
- 4. It supports URL.
- 5. Ember uses observers to change values which result in rendering the values being changed.
- 6. Ember offers faster boot time and inherent stability.
- 7. It focuses on performance.
- 8. Ember offers friendly docs and API.
B2: Screaming Demerits
- 1. With Ember.js you will get a lot of outdated content which no longer work.
- 2. While working in Ember.js you can lack reuse of components at Controller level.
- 3. It is clumsy when we go outside its typical use.
- 4. The most inflexible and heaviest of frameworks.
- 5. The testing process seems incomplete.
- 6. Overwritten for small projects.
B3: Who Should Use Ember
For writing web apps, Ember framework is a great choice. Many aspiring apps are built using Ember framework. If you are a Ruby shop, Ember is a great choice. Ember is also a great solution for people who buy into the all-tools-included framework approach. Ember makes quite a lot of decisions for you offering surprising values. Those who want everything to just work well will love Ember.
Facebook was facing the problems of consistent user interface. They created React to solve the problems of keeping their UI consistent across the page. Facebook made its release of React framework which offered the incredible advantage of awesome performance and server side rendering. React framework continues making large improvements in the domain of frameworks. The most prominent are React Native.
- 1. With very little dependencies the components can be easily imported.
- 2. Quiet simplified interface design and easy to learn API.
- 3. The server-side rendering allows the creation of universal web apps.
- 5. Good code reuse.
- 6. For improving the performance of troublesome components, React framework supports a lot.
- 7. React framework is a fully component based architecture.
- 8. Easy interface design and learning API.
- 1. It is not a complete framework but it is a library.
- 2. Many people have strong disapproval for JSX.
- 3. Steep learning curve.
- 4. Integrating ReactJS with conventional MVC framework such as Rails will require some configurations.
C3: Who Should Consider ReactJS?
For new and existing projects, ReactJS is a great choice. If you have modernized an existing code base, ReactJS simplifies the process by pulling out pieces of the user interface and then redoing the same. If you believe in simple libraries more than you believe in complete frameworks, then ReactJS can be your choice. ReactJS minimizes the challenges on part of web apps.
— Angular News (@AngularJS_News) January 13, 2017
D- Who Wins?
To determine which framework is right for you depends on evaluating your application’s needs versus the merits of each framework. It definitely requires in-depth knowledge of merits and drawbacks of each framework and how they can be considered under different use cases. If you are looking for a long term support and active communities for creation of a web app AngularJS, React, and Ember are a safe bet. As we can easily infer that there is no specific winner and all frameworks fit in according to the requirements. Gauge your project based on various parameters like dependencies, features, interoperability, maturity and size and then consider the suitable framework.
Blog References: freecodecamp, blog.backand, forums.meteor, business2community, smashingboxes, blog.softelegance