Salesforce promises visibility, efficiency and growth. Yet most executives share the same frustration “we invested heavily, we went live, but the results are not what we expected.”

Adoption lags, sales teams slip back to old tools and the ROI conversation gets uncomfortable.

The problem is not Salesforce itself; the platform is proven. The issue is execution. Too many Salesforce transformations stall because companies rush to build, skip the hard work of defining outcomes and treat post-go-live as an afterthought.

This is where working with a trusted Salesforce development company following define, build and run philosophy becomes critical; not just to implement features, but to establish an operating model that balances speed with stability.

What is “define. build. run.” and why should executives care?

Think of Define. Build. Run. as more than just project stages. It’s an operating model for how your company turns Salesforce transformation into measurable business outcomes and keeps them compounding.

• Define: Clarify business outcomes, align stakeholders, set scope.
• Build: Design, configure, test and deploy with discipline.
• Run: Drive adoption, monitor performance and continuously evolve the platform.

When companies treat these phases as isolated, failures compound. Define hands off incomplete goals. Build delivers features no one uses. Run collapses without governance.

Most Salesforce transformations don’t fail because of technology; they’re failures of definition and discipline.

For executives, this model matters because Salesforce isn’t just IT plumbing. It’s a revenue system, a customer experience engine and a data backbone. Neglecting any phase means leaving money on the table.

Why do most Salesforce transformations stall?

So, the question arises: why is your Salesforce failing even when you are doing everything right? The truth is, Salesforce rarely fails; execution does. Here are the main reasons Salesforce transformations stall:

• Unclear goals: Broad objectives like “improve sales efficiency” without clear KPIs.
• Over-customization: Building too much, too fast, leading to complexity and technical debt.
• Poor data quality: Inconsistent or duplicate records erode trust in reports and dashboards.
• Lack of change management: Users aren’t trained or motivated to shift away from old habits.
• No ownership post-launch: Once go-live happens, there’s no team driving adoption or improvements.
• Treating go-live as the finish line: The project ends, but evolution stops too.

The fix: strengthening each phase

If stalled projects have a pattern, so do the ones that succeed. They don’t apply any shortcuts in the initial stage, nor do they overcomplicate the building phase and most importantly, they never treat the last stage as an afterthought. Instead, they strengthen each phase of Salesforce transformation with discipline and clarity. Let’s dive deep into what each phase can do for a successful Salesforce project.

Define: How do you make business value non-negotiable?

Defining isn’t about collecting requirements in a spreadsheet. It’s about locking down the why behind every investment in Salesforce transformation.

• Tie objectives to real KPIs: Focus on metrics executives can measure; forecast accuracy, win rates, case resolution times or pipeline velocity. Without numbers, you’re just guessing.
• Get stakeholders in the room early: Sales, service, marketing, operations and IT all see the system differently. Misalignment here leads to painful course corrections later.
• Be ruthless with scope: Aim for phased delivery. Solve today’s biggest pain points first, then expand. A 24-month “all-in” build is a recipe for drift and fatigue.
• Decide trade-offs upfront: Will you prioritize speed or completeness? Customization or standardization? Having a decision framework avoids endless debates.

The best Salesforce transformations start with a business conversation, not a feature wishlist.

Build: What does a high-impact build phase look like?

In this phase, discipline meets design. The goal isn’t to pack in features but to create a system people actually want to use. A sloppy Build is often the reason a Salesforce transformation fails to scale.

• Configuration before customization: Use Salesforce’s out-of-the-box capabilities wherever possible. Every line of custom code adds long-term maintenance costs.
• Design for roles, not just functions: A sales rep’s workflow should look and feel different from a service agent’s. Personalization drives adoption.
• Pilot, prove, then scale: Release in smaller increments, validate with real users and expand once you see results.
• Bake in change management: Training, communication and champions aren’t “extras”; they’re part of the build. Launching without them almost guarantees rejection.
• Keep testing continuous: Functional, integration and user acceptance testing should be part of every sprint, not left to the end.

Run: Why most projects die quietly in this phase

Here’s where most Salesforce transformations fade. After go-live, teams disband, budgets dry up and Salesforce becomes shelfware. But this is also where long-term ROI is created; if you treat Run the right way.

• Shift from project to product mindset: Run isn’t closure; it’s ownership. Create a Center of Excellence (CoE) or product owner role to oversee enhancements and enforce standards.
• Track adoption relentlessly: Metrics like login frequency, record updates and pipeline hygiene are early warning signals. If they dip, business value is slipping.
• Invest in continuous improvement: Keep a backlog of enhancements and release on a predictable cadence; monthly or quarterly. This builds user trust and keeps the platform aligned with business needs.
• Close the feedback loop: Encourage users to submit feedback and visibly act on it. When users see their input shaping the platform, adoption climbs.
• Plan budgets for evolution: Successful companies allocate ongoing funding for Run, not just for the initial project.

To keep Salesforce not just alive but future-proof, you also need to bake in AI readiness. Our guide on Salesforce AI strategy dives into how to structure your system so AI features don’t stay pilots, but become part of your operational backbone.

Too many companies budget for implementation, but not for evolution.

How do you balance speed with stability?

The paradox is that moving too quickly without the right foundation often slows you down later. Therefore, to balance speed with stability, you must pick a model that delivers both without any compromise for a successful Salesforce transformation. Here is how you do it:

• Adopt agile, but with guardrails: Break delivery into sprints with clear exit criteria. Don’t skip planning or testing in the name of velocity.
• Use accelerators wisely: Templates, pre-built integrations and automation can shorten timelines without sacrificing quality.
• Keep executive checkpoints short and sharp: Every few weeks, confirm progress against defined KPIs, not just delivery milestones.
• Phase your rollout: Start with high-value, low-complexity use cases. Prove impact, then scale.

Speed without stability creates rework. Stability without speed creates irrelevance. You need both.

How do enterprise and mid-market clients approach this differently?

The best thing about “define, build and run” approach is that it applies universally. However, the execution might look different depending on the scale of your project.

In the enterprise

Large organizations face complexity across geographies, business units and compliance requirements. That means:

• Formal governance: A Center of Excellence (CoE) with clear ownership of standards, release cycles and adoption metrics.
• Integration discipline: Salesforce is rarely standalone. It must tie into ERP, marketing automation, customer data platforms and analytics systems.
• Structured change management: Layered training, role-based communication and regional champions keep thousands of users aligned.

In the mid-market

On the other hand, mid-sized companies don’t have the same layer of bureaucracy; but they can’t afford to wing it either. Their focus is on:

• Lean governance: A small but empowered admin or product owner who balances priorities and owns adoption.
• Rapid wins: Shorter cycles that show value quickly, especially when budgets are under scrutiny.
• Scalable design: Even if today’s rollout is small, the architecture should support tomorrow’s growth.

The difference isn’t in whether you follow Define. Build. Run; it’s in how much process, oversight and investment each stage of a Salesforce transformation requires.

Scale doesn’t just mean size. It means readiness for future complexity.

Conclusion

Salesforce doesn’t fail; execution does. Most Salesforce transformations stall because outcomes aren’t defined, builds get overcomplicated and the last stage is ignored. Define. Build. Run. fixes that by making value non-negotiable, adoption continuous and growth repeatable.

Meet the Algoworks team at Dreamforce to see how we turn stalled rollouts into engines of business growth.

The following two tabs change content below.

• Bio
• Latest Posts

Ravi Jain

Ravi Jain is a seasoned leader with over 14 years of experience in BI, Analytics, Salesforce and Cloud solutions. He has guided growth strategies and delivered large-scale IT initiatives that solve complex business challenges across global delivery models. Known for his sharp insights and hands-on execution, Ravi specializes in building data-driven roadmaps and driving transformative projects that create measurable business impact.

Latest posts by Ravi Jain (see all)