The pitfalls of template-driven design: how it’s impacting user experience
This isn’t a rant about templates. It’s a reflection that comes from years of working with design systems, UI kits and pre-built components and seeing how easily we start relying on them a little too much.
If you’re a UX designer, product manager or even someone leading a design team, chances are you’ve felt it: the quiet shift from thoughtful problem-solving to just… plugging things in. It’s subtle. It creeps in through deadlines, team alignment or the excitement of using “industry standards.” But over time, it changes how we think, how we create and how we connect with users.
Let’s talk about that shift.
Why are designers stuck?
As a UX designer, starting from a blank screen used to mean you’d speak to users, uncover unknowns and sketch out workflows. Now, it often starts by duplicating a template, dragging components from a system and tweaking spacing.
This shift saves time but also narrows your thinking. According to Wikipedia, a design system is a “collection of reusable components guided by clear standards,” and while that’s incredibly helpful for scale, it’s also easy to misuse.
What began as tools to reduce grunt work now often replace foundational UX design services. UX designers spend more time aligning UI to the system than aligning solutions to the problem.
Design systems like IBM’s Carbon or Google’s Material were created to scale thoughtful design, but they assume the thought has already happened. If it hasn’t, all you’re doing is moving the UI parts around.
Templates are solving for speed, not for people
Let’s be honest. We love templates because they make us faster. And in high-pressure environments, that’s invaluable. But when speed becomes the only goal, something critical gets left behind: relevance.
You might end up with a product that looks clean and modern but misses the mark completely when it comes to user needs. In contrast, smart, adaptive UI design leverages AI to align better with real-time user behavior and preferences. Templates make it easier to start, but they don’t help you understand why you’re designing something in the first place.
The illusion of innovation inside a template
Most modern SaaS products, especially dashboards, look nearly identical. It’s not because they arrived at the same design conclusions, but because they’re borrowing the same UI kits, layout patterns and heuristics.
Using the standard “sidebar + top nav + card layout” doesn’t mean you’re designing smart. It means you’re working within a safe mold.
But design maturity is about breaking patterns when they’re misaligned. A user managing critical data workflows doesn’t need the same interface as a content creator for scheduling social posts; yet they’re often given the same UI structure.
Templates give you pre-made answers. The real work is knowing when the question has changed and that’s where great UX Designers make a difference.
When sameness becomes a UX liability
When every product starts to look and feel the same, users begin to make assumptions — and that can backfire.
In usability sessions, users often mis click or hesitate, not because of bad design, but because they expected your app to work like another. They look for filters where none exist. They expect auto-save because it’s standard elsewhere and blame your product when it’s missing.
This isn’t a user error. It’s an expectation mismatch, caused by generic UI rather than user-driven design.
Sameness can be comforting, but only when paired with clarity. Without that, it leads to confusion and worse, a loss of trust.
Accessibility and inclusion don’t come pre-installed
Many teams assume templates handle accessibility. And yes, many systems ship with ARIA roles, keyboard focus and semantic structure.
But that’s not the same as inclusion.
True accessibility accounts for how users interact across devices, environments and limitations. A component may technically meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards but still frustrates a user relying on screen readers or magnification tools.
Templates can’t account for cultural context, motor skill variance or edge devices in low-bandwidth areas. Only research and UX Design Services can. And if you skip that, your product might look compliant but still exclude real people.
Design culture is becoming passive and that is scary
We’re seeing it everywhere. Portfolios that look identical. Case studies that follow the same formula. Endless carousels on social media about “clean UI” and “top 5 UX tips.” This pattern is also reflected in recent UI/UX trends highlighted in the ASCI study, which show a clear drift toward uniformity over originality.
It’s not laziness; it’s the result of a design culture optimizing for speed, consistency and performance metrics. But in doing so, we’ve deprioritized field research, user observation, and edge-case thinking.
Design is supposed to be investigative. But when templates define the project from day one, teams stop asking hard questions. They stop learning. They start performing. And the users? They notice. Even if they can’t say what’s wrong, they feel the disconnect; something that only experienced UX Designers can usually diagnose.
The design system isn’t the enemy; but your mindset might be
Design systems are powerful. When used correctly, they reduce friction, help scale teams and keep visual logic clean.
But the problem starts when teams mistake the system for the solution. When a screen review becomes about padding and alignment instead of the user journey. Also, critique devolves checking tokens instead of challenging assumptions.
Systems should scaffold your thinking, not override it. The best systems are flexible, allowing for deviation when user context demands it. This becomes especially critical in evolving digital spaces like the metaverse, where rigid UI patterns can’t keep up with immersive, interactive user expectations.
If yours doesn’t or your team isn’t willing to break away when needed, that’s a mindset gap; one that weakens your UX Design Services.
How to know if you’re stuck in the template trap
It’s not always obvious. But here’s what to watch for:
- You start every project by duplicating a Figma template, not reviewing research.
- Every page follows the same grid, even when user behavior suggests otherwise.
- Design reviews focus on “is it clean?” rather than “does it work?”
- You feel no ownership, just relief that the sprint is done.
This isn’t a failure. It’s a wake-up call for your UX Design Services strategy.
How to break out without burning everything down
You don’t need to throw your design system out, just need to lead with purpose, not patterns. Start with users, not layouts. Even if time is tight, squeeze in a quick test or conversation. You’ll be surprised at what that surfaces.
Let the system support your work, not dictate it. Break the rules when they hurt usability. Challenge defaults when they mask real problems. That’s not reinventing the wheel. That’s UX Design Services done right.
Creativity needs friction templates erase it
Templates are efficient, but they’re also smooth by design. They remove the ambiguity, the slow thinking, the tension and that’s often where the best ideas live. Interestingly, tools like generative AI in UX design are beginning to reintroduce that friction and randomness; helping designers rediscover their creative edge.
When everything clicks too easily, you stop questioning. You start assuming. And that’s dangerous. A good UX Designer needs space to feel stuck. That’s the sign you’re actually solving something new.
Don’t just design; disrupt the default
You have a choice every time you open Figma or click “Duplicate template.” Either you can follow the expected path or you can pause, question and shape something more meaningful.
Templates are helpful. But they’re also invitations to stop thinking. It’s up to you to challenge that respectfully, intentionally and when it matters most.
Because at the end of the day, users don’t care how polished your components are. They care whether your product gets them. And templates alone won’t get you there. Ready to rethink your product’s experience? Talk to a UX designer at Algoworks and let’s design what actually matters.
Debbie Neuman
Latest posts by Debbie Neuman (see all)
